Epstein Files - Part 4
ED-S1
4,553 pages unsealed. More than 150 names. Some names appeared. Others stayed redacted. No one named in the documents has been charged.
On December 18 2023 US District Judge Loretta Preska ordered the unsealing of documents from Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-07433, a civil defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell in 2015 and settled in 2017. The documents were released in eight batches between January and March 2024. In total 4,553 pages were made public, containing the names of more than 150 people connected to or mentioned in legal proceedings related to Epstein and his network. The documents are depositions, exhibits, FBI interview notes, email and phone correspondence, Epstein's contact books and flight logs. Being named in the documents does not equate to being accused of wrongdoing. No individual named in the 4,553 pages has been charged by any federal prosecutor as a result of their appearance in these documents.
ED-S2
The release · Giuffre v. Maxwell · Eight batches · January to March 2024 · 4,553 pages02 / 07
Giuffre v. Maxwell. Settled 2017. Unsealed 2024. Eight batches. 4,553 pages. Judge Loretta Preska, SDNY.
The documents unsealed in 2024 come from Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-07433, filed in 2015 by Virginia Roberts Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It was a civil defamation lawsuit. Giuffre alleged Maxwell defamed her by calling her a liar when Giuffre described being trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell. The case settled in 2017. The documents were sealed as part of that settlement. In 2022 a consortium of media organisations including the Miami Herald and the New York Times petitioned Judge Preska to unseal them. Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-07433, SDNY.
Judge Preska issued her unsealing order on December 18 2023, ordering the documents to be released on a rolling basis beginning January 1 2024. The first batch was filed on January 3 2024. The documents were released in eight batches between January and March 2024. The final batch contained seven documents and ran to 1,500 pages. The total released: 4,553 pages containing the names of more than 150 people. NBC News reported on January 9-10 2024 that being named in the suit does not equate to being accused of wrongdoing. NBC News, January 9-10 2024, nbcnews.com · Axios, January 4 2024, axios.com.
Source: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-07433, SDNY · NBC News, January 9-10 2024, nbcnews.com · Axios, January 4 2024, axios.com
ED-S3
The redactions · What stayed sealed · Privacy interests · Victims and minors protected03 / 07
Not everything was unsealed. Judge Preska preserved redactions where privacy interests outweighed public disclosure. Some names remain shielded. Some documents remain sealed.
Judge Preska's unsealing order preserved redactions over certain names and identifying details where she determined that the privacy interests of uninvolved third parties, particularly victims and minors, outweighed public disclosure. Alleged minor victims of Epstein were allowed to remain confidential. The court extended the anonymity of two Does, identified as Doe 107 and Doe 110, pending further review of whether their identification would bring physical harm. EpsteinExposed.com noted in February 2026 that the identities that were released were largely already known from previous public documents, which was one reason Preska approved their disclosure. EpsteinExposed.com, February 10 2026, epsteinexposed.com.
The Epstein Files Transparency Act was signed into law by President Trump on November 19 2025. It directed the Department of Justice to publicly release responsive records by December 19 2025. The DOJ released three million files from six million Epstein files recovered. The majority were redacted. The SDNY court noted on January 21 2026 that DOJ had not complied with the December 19 2025 deadline in full. In August 2026 Judge Preska ordered the unsealing of further materials under the Act: grand jury subpoenas issued to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP during the federal investigation that led to Epstein's 2019 arrest. SDNY Opinion, January 21 2026 · Courthouse News, August 2026, courthousenews.com.
Source: EpsteinExposed.com, February 10 2026 · SDNY Opinion, January 21 2026, nysd.uscourts.gov · Courthouse News, August 2026, courthousenews.com
ED-S4
What the names mean · And what they do not · Depositions · Exhibits · Contact books · Not an indictment04 / 07
The names appear in depositions, FBI interview notes, email correspondence, Epstein's contact books and flight logs. They are not charges. They are not convictions. They are what a court ordered released.
The names in the 4,553 pages appear in different contexts and carry different weight. Some are alleged perpetrators described in Giuffre's deposition testimony. Some are witnesses. Some are individuals mentioned in passing in other depositions. Some appear in Epstein's contact books or phone records as associates or acquaintances. Some appear in FBI interview notes compiled during the federal investigation. The documents are standard repositories of names that appear in any large civil litigation: depositions, exhibits, correspondence and investigative files. EpsteinExposed.com, February 10 2026 · Factually, February 11 2026.
Judge Preska confirmed in her unsealing order that the fact that a name appears in these documents does not constitute an accusation of wrongdoing. No individual named in the 4,553 pages has been charged by the DOJ, the SDNY or any other federal prosecutor as a direct result of their appearance in these documents. The documents are a primary source. They document what was filed in a civil defamation case. They are not a substitute for a criminal proceeding and they have not produced one. NBC News, January 9-10 2024, nbcnews.com · Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-07433, SDNY.
Source: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-07433, SDNY · NBC News, January 9-10 2024, nbcnews.com · EpsteinExposed.com, February 10 2026
ED-S5
The DOJ · Six million files · Three million released · Majority redacted · Deadline not met in full05 / 07
Six million Epstein files recovered. Three million released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The majority were redacted. The December 19 2025 deadline was not met in full.
The Epstein Files Transparency Act, passed by Congress and signed into law by President Trump on November 19 2025, directed the Department of Justice to publicly release responsive records by December 19 2025. Following the Act's enactment the DOJ released three million files from the six million Epstein files it had recovered. Reports from early 2026 documented that the majority of the released files were redacted. The SDNY court noted on January 21 2026 that DOJ had not complied with the December 19 2025 statutory deadline in full. SDNY Opinion, January 21 2026, nysd.uscourts.gov · Courthouse News, August 2026.
Virginia Giuffre, the plaintiff in Giuffre v. Maxwell whose documents formed the basis of the 2024 unsealing, died by suicide in April 2025. She was 41 years old. The documents she litigated for years to make public had been unsealed fourteen months before her death. Her death did not halt the legal proceedings related to the Epstein investigation. In August 2026 Judge Preska ordered the unsealing of further materials under the Epstein Files Transparency Act pursuant to a DOJ motion. Morning Honey, September 2026 · Courthouse News, August 2026, courthousenews.com.
Source: SDNY Opinion, January 21 2026, nysd.uscourts.gov · Courthouse News, August 2026, courthousenews.com · Morning Honey, September 2026
ED-S7
The question. Not a claim. Series continues next week: Parts 5 and 6. Series final.06 / 07
4,553 pages unsealed. More than 150 names. Eight batches. Three million files released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The majority redacted. No co-conspirator other than Maxwell charged at any point in the process. What is the difference between a document release and accountability?
Next week: the death. August 10 2019. The cameras failed. The guards had not completed their rounds. The official ruling: suicide by hanging. A forensic pathologist hired by Epstein's brother examined the same body and reached a different conclusion. The ruling has not changed. Part 5 of 6. Then: the silence. Who has not been charged. What the system produced. Series final. Part 6 of 6.
Some stories are buried on purpose. We dig.
Two new stories every weekFollow UNSILENCED.